Agricultural cooperatives hold enormous potential – pooling resources, improving market access, and strengthening the bargaining power of small-scale farmers. Yet many cooperatives across developing regions consistently fall short of their promise. The reason is rarely a lack of goodwill among members; it is almost always a cluster of recurring management problems that, left unaddressed, quietly erode financial stability and collective trust. Research by the FAO identifies three foundational weaknesses that burden cooperative movements: economic viability of core activities, leadership and management capacity, and the absence of genuine democratic member control. Understanding these problems in detail is the first step toward solving them.
Table of Contents
- The tension between profit orientation and member service
- Inadequate loan management
- Poor bookkeeping practices
- Mixing personal and society accounts
- Incomplete records and absent financial reporting
- Absence of job descriptions and organizational structure
- Low member awareness of bylaws and financial statements
- Lack of training for management and staff
- Addressing management challenges through education and systemic reform
The tension between profit orientation and member service
One of the most persistent dilemmas in cooperative management is the conflict between generating profit and serving members. A cooperative, by its foundational principles, exists to meet the economic and social needs of its members – not simply to maximize financial returns. According to the ILO, cooperatives are defined by values of democratic member control, economic participation, and concern for community – values that sit uneasily alongside a narrow profit-first mindset.
When cooperative managers begin to treat the organization purely as a commercial enterprise, decisions shift toward revenue maximization rather than member benefit. Input prices rise, credit becomes harder to access, and the surplus is retained at the organizational level rather than distributed equitably. This profit-oriented drift is especially damaging in agricultural cooperatives, where members are often small-scale farmers who joined specifically to reduce costs and access services they could not secure individually. The result is a cooperative that looks financially viable on paper but has lost its core purpose.
Inadequate loan management
Credit provision is one of the most valued services a cooperative can offer its members. It is also one of the areas where mismanagement causes the most lasting damage. Sound financial management in a cooperative requires proper credit assessment tools, clear documentation of loan terms, repayment schedules, and follow-up mechanisms. In practice, many cooperatives lack all of these.
Loan approvals in poorly managed cooperatives are often based on personal relationships rather than creditworthiness. Without robust documentation, it becomes difficult to track outstanding debts or initiate recovery proceedings. A study of rural cooperatives in Zimbabwe found that lack of access to credit facilities was the second most commonly cited challenge by members, reflecting how quickly trust erodes when loan systems are mismanaged. When repayments default and funds dry up, the cooperative’s ability to extend credit to other members collapses – triggering a cycle of reduced membership and declining services.
Effective loan management requires more than goodwill. It requires a formal loan register that records every loan granted, the amounts approved, repayment periods, and collateral details. Cooperative accounting frameworks recommend maintaining a dedicated loan register as a source document, ensuring every transaction is traceable and auditable.
Poor bookkeeping practices
If loan mismanagement threatens financial survival, poor bookkeeping makes every other problem invisible until it is too late. Many cooperatives – especially those in rural areas – struggle with maintaining accurate, complete, and timely financial records. Research on cooperative sustainability identifies poor management and inadequate accounting as core challenges facing agricultural cooperatives across Asia and Africa.
Mixing personal and society accounts
Among all bookkeeping failures, mixing personal funds with cooperative society funds is one of the most destructive. When a manager or committee member uses society funds for personal expenses – or deposits cooperative income into personal accounts – it becomes nearly impossible to determine the cooperative’s true financial position. Financial management guidelines for cooperatives are explicit on this point: a dedicated account for the society’s funds ensures cleaner records, simplifies audits, and builds trust among members. Commingling funds, on the other hand, distorts financial performance data, leads to inaccurate budgets, and can expose the cooperative to legal liability.
This problem is compounded when there is no segregation of duties – that is, when the same individual handles cash, approves transactions, and maintains records. Separating these responsibilities is a basic internal control that prevents both accidental errors and deliberate fraud.
Incomplete records and absent financial reporting
Even cooperatives that keep some records often fail to maintain them consistently. Minor transactions are left unrecorded, different staff use different formats, and monthly trial balances are never prepared. Without regular and accurate financial reporting, cooperative managers cannot make sound decisions about pricing, investments, or resource allocation. Members, too, remain uninformed about the financial health of their cooperative – unable to hold management accountable or contribute meaningfully to planning. The USDA’s guidance on cooperative bookkeeping emphasizes that a complete picture of financial operations requires daily journals, a general ledger, and consolidated member records – documents that together allow managers and board members to understand exactly where the cooperative stands at any given time.
Absence of job descriptions and organizational structure
A cooperative without clearly defined job descriptions is a cooperative prone to confusion, overlap, and accountability gaps. When no one knows precisely who is responsible for what, critical tasks – loan follow-ups, financial reporting, member communication – fall through the cracks. The ILO’s Start.COOP training framework underlines that a cooperative’s organizational structure must be built on democratic principles, with a Board of Directors setting policy, a manager overseeing daily operations, and committees handling specific functions such as audit, credit, and elections.
In practice, many cooperatives – particularly newer or smaller ones – operate without this structure in place. Elected board members take on management tasks they are not trained for. Managers make policy decisions that belong to the board. Staff perform tasks outside their competence with no clear line of supervision. This structural ambiguity makes it difficult to identify where problems originate or who should correct them. Defining roles formally, in writing, and aligning each role with the cooperative’s bylaws is a basic governance requirement that is frequently overlooked.
Low member awareness of bylaws and financial statements
Cooperative members are also owners. They have the right – and the responsibility – to understand the rules that govern their cooperative and to scrutinize how their collective resources are being used. Yet in many cooperatives, a large proportion of members are unaware of the cooperative’s bylaws, have never read its financial statements, and have little understanding of how decisions are made on their behalf.
FAO’s analysis of cooperative reform points out that there is often excessive emphasis on legislation rather than on the practical cooperative knowledge that would prepare members for democratic and participatory management. Members who are uninformed cannot vote meaningfully at general assemblies, cannot question management decisions, and cannot hold their elected board accountable. This creates a passive membership culture that is easy to exploit – either through mismanagement or through the quiet accumulation of power by a few individuals. Studies on cooperative challenges in Ethiopia identify lack of governance and lack of integrity among management as key barriers to accountability, both of which are directly linked to uninformed, disengaged membership.
Improving member awareness requires cooperatives to develop simple, accessible materials explaining cooperative principles, bylaws, and financial information in plain language. Regular general meetings, newsletters, and informal community discussions are practical channels for keeping members informed and engaged.
Lack of training for management and staff
Underlying most of the problems discussed above is a single, correctable root cause: inadequate training. Research on cooperative sustainability consistently shows that poor management, lack of managerial talent, and inadequate training programs are among the most significant factors hindering cooperative accountability and growth.
Training in cooperatives must be multi-level. Management teams need skills in financial management, leadership, and cooperative principles. Board members need training in governance, strategic planning, and their oversight responsibilities. Members need education on their rights, their responsibilities, and the basic business principles that govern the cooperative’s operations. The ILO and FAO jointly developed the My.COOP training programme specifically to strengthen the management of agricultural cooperatives, covering member satisfaction, business opportunities, and organizational governance – a recognition that building management capacity is not a one-time workshop but an ongoing developmental process.
Training programs are most effective when they are practical, rooted in local conditions, and use real-world case studies that cooperative managers and members can relate to. A training session that teaches bookkeeping using actual cooperative data is far more useful than one built on abstract accounting theory. Peer learning networks, where cooperatives share experiences and learn from each other’s mistakes, are also a cost-effective supplement to formal training. Successful cooperative reform programs, such as those supported by the ILO in Jordan, combine legislative improvement with dedicated training institutions to sustain the gains over time.
Addressing management challenges through education and systemic reform
The management problems facing cooperatives are serious, but they are not insurmountable. Most of them – from poor bookkeeping to low member awareness – can be significantly reduced through sustained, well-designed education and training. The FAO’s assessment of cooperative development emphasizes that successful restructuring hinges on developing competent business management and genuine member service – two outcomes that are achievable only when both managers and members understand their roles clearly.
Cooperatives that invest in defining job descriptions, separating personal and society accounts, maintaining systematic loan records, and educating their members about bylaws and financial statements are cooperatives that build lasting trust. And it is trust, ultimately, that determines whether a cooperative thrives or gradually dissolves into the same dysfunction it was created to overcome. As the OCDC notes, cooperatives must be well managed, efficient, and effective in the contemporary market – and achieving that standard depends directly on how seriously management challenges are identified and addressed.
What do you think? If you were advising a newly formed agricultural cooperative, which management problem would you prioritize fixing first – and why? Do you think poor bookkeeping or low member awareness poses a greater long-term risk to a cooperative’s survival?
References
- https://www.fao.org/4/v4595e/v4595e07.htm
- https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/cooperatives/lang–en/index.htm
- https://www.nobrokerhood.com/blog/co-operative-society-accounting/
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6014090/
- https://ohimaiconsulting.com/cooperative-accounting/
- https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321048287_SUSTAINABILITY_OF_COOPERATIVES_ISSUES_AND_CHALLENGES
- https://mbs.cpa/bookkeeping-mistakes/
- https://www.rd.usda.gov/sites/default/files/cir57.pdf
- https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_emp/@emp_ent/@coop/documents/instructionalmaterial/wcms_644709.pdf
- https://www.fao.org/4/w3708e/W3708E05.htm
- https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330106600_Growth_and_Challenges_of_Cooperative_Sector_in_Ethiopia
- https://www.ilo.org/social-and-solidarity-economy-education-and-training
- https://www.ilo.org/resource/news/jordan-adopts-key-amendments-cooperative-law-ilo-support
- https://ocdc.coop/resource-center/cooperative-dependency-in-developing-countries-a-systematic-literature-review
Leave a Reply