Understanding Milk Disposal Patterns in India

India produces more milk than any other country in the world – 239.3 million tonnes in 2023-24, which is over 24% of global output. Yet, behind this impressive number lies a complex story of how that milk actually moves – from the udder to the consumer. Not all milk produced reaches the market. A significant portion stays within the household, used for direct consumption or converted into dairy products like ghee, curd, and paneer. The way farmers decide what to keep and what to sell is what dairy scientists refer to as the milk disposal pattern. Understanding this pattern is essential for anyone involved in milk procurement, dairy policy, or rural agricultural economics.

What is a milk disposal pattern? 🔗

Milk disposal pattern refers to how a dairy farmer distributes the milk produced across different end uses – self-consumption, on-farm processing into dairy products, and sale to the market. It is essentially a breakdown of the marketable surplus (milk available after household needs are met) and how that surplus flows through different marketing channels.

At the national level, a broad and widely referenced distribution is observed: approximately 40% of milk is retained by producer households for self-use or home processing, while 60% is marketed. This 40:60 ratio, though it varies by region, farm size, and season, reflects the general pattern observed across rural India. Around 50% of milk produced in India is consumed by producers themselves, with the remainder distributed in the market – a figure that aligns with this broad understanding, with slight variation based on data source and methodology.

How marketed milk is split: the organized vs. traditional sector divide 🔗

Of the 60% of milk that enters the market, the distribution between the two main sectors is stark. The traditional (unorganized) sector handles approximately 78% of marketed milk, while the organized sector manages the remaining 22%. About 60% of surplus milk is handled by the unorganized sector – local milkmen and vendors – while 40% is procured by dairy cooperatives and private companies, though exact percentages vary by study and reporting period.

The traditional sector includes local milk vendors, direct consumer sales, tea stalls, sweet shops, and informal dairy product manufacturers. These channels are built on personal relationships, daily cash payments, and flexibility in quantity. The organized sector, on the other hand, covers cooperatives like Amul (Gujarat Cooperative Milk Marketing Federation), state dairy federations, and private processors such as Nestlé, Hatsun Agro, and Mother Dairy. Cooperatives operate through 190,000 village societies and dominate liquid-milk procurement, though private processors lead in higher-margin products like cheese and flavored milk.

For context on how different India’s dairy structure is from the rest of the world: in developed countries, about 90% of surplus milk is handled through the organized sector – the near-opposite of India’s current situation.

Why the traditional sector still dominates 🔗

The persistence of the traditional sector is not simply a matter of habit. It is deeply tied to how India’s dairy farming operates. With 95% of India’s milk producers having herd sizes of just one to five animals, most dairy farmers produce small volumes each day. Local vendors accommodate these small and variable quantities, offer immediate cash payment, and do not impose strict quality tests. For many small producers, this flexibility is non-negotiable.

In contrast, organized sector procurement often requires adherence to fat and SNF (solids-not-fat) standards, fixed collection schedules, and bank-linked payment systems – all of which can be barriers for marginal farmers. Small milk producers commonly face challenges such as low marketable surplus, limited access to quality inputs, delayed payments in informal markets, and restricted access to veterinary and credit services.

Factors that influence how much milk is retained vs. sold 🔗

The 40:60 split is a national average, not a fixed rule. Several interconnected factors determine how individual households decide what to keep and what to sell.

Scale of production 🔗

Farm size has a clear and well-documented influence. Research in Andhra Pradesh found that the marketed surplus percentage was highest among marginal farmers (81.82%) and lowest among large farmers (74.41%) – a counterintuitive finding explained by the fact that even small producers prioritize cash income when their absolute volumes are low. A separate study in Northern Karnataka found that daily household milk production ranged from 9.61 litres for small farmers to 26.73 litres for large farmers, with larger producers retaining more in absolute terms for home processing.

Family size and household consumption needs 🔗

Larger families consume more milk for direct drinking, tea, and cooking, which reduces the quantity available for marketing. Research in rural Bihar found that sale preferences significantly restricted the quantity of milk consumed in milk-producing households, indicating a direct trade-off between feeding the family and generating income. Studies have also shown that family size has a positive correlation with milk quality at the household level, as larger families tend to handle milk more carefully given its role in daily nutrition.

Economic conditions and income needs 🔗

When a household faces an urgent cash requirement – school fees, medical expenses, loan repayment – more milk flows to the market. Conversely, when cash pressure is low, families may retain more milk for home processing into ghee or paneer, which fetch better per-litre returns than raw milk. Research confirms that procurement price has a positive effect on marketed surplus, while family size is negatively correlated with it. In short, higher prices encourage more selling; larger families pull more milk inward.

Preference for home-processed dairy products 🔗

Converting raw milk into products like ghee, buttermilk, curd, or khoya at home is a deeply embedded practice in rural India. It is also economically rational. Ghee and paneer command significantly higher prices per litre of milk equivalent than raw liquid milk, and they have longer shelf lives. About 40% of India’s overall milk production circulates through traditional channels that include millions of traditional processors – sweet makers, curd sellers, and tea vendors – who source from household producers directly. Regional food cultures also matter: regions with strong ghee and buttermilk traditions tend to retain higher proportions for home processing.

How disposal patterns shape milk procurement strategies 🔗

The milk disposal pattern has a direct bearing on how dairy cooperatives and private companies design their procurement operations. Since the bulk of marketable milk moves through informal channels, organized sector players cannot simply expect farmers to redirect supply to them. They need to actively build trust, offer competitive pricing, and reduce friction in the procurement process.

The National Dairy Development Board (NDDB) has explicitly recognized this challenge. Its village-based milk procurement strategy focuses on creating institutional structures at the village level, promoting dairy cooperatives and producer companies in areas where formal procurement is weak, and ensuring fair and transparent pricing systems that incentivize more farmers to shift from informal to organized marketing.

The government’s National Programme for Dairy Development (NPDD), restructured in 2021 for implementation through 2025-26, aims to increase the organized sector’s share of procurement, processing, and marketing. Under the scheme, over 17 lakh new farmers have been enrolled in dairy cooperative societies, and additional milk processing and chilling infrastructure has been created at the village level.

State-level cooperative data illustrates what is possible when organized procurement works well. In Andhra Pradesh, 96.21% of milk from member households was channeled to dairy cooperatives, demonstrating that when quality incentives, timely payments, and institutional trust are in place, farmers consistently prefer organized channels.

Regional variations in disposal patterns 🔗

Milk disposal is not uniform across India. Regional differences in farm structure, cooperative penetration, and food culture all contribute to varying patterns. In Rajasthan’s Banswara district, about 76% of marketed surplus was sold through the unorganized sector and the rest to the organized sector. In Northern Karnataka, 57.73% of marketed surplus went through the unorganized sector and 42.27% through organized channels. In Jammu and Kashmir, organized players handle only about 5% of the marketed surplus, reflecting severely underdeveloped cooperative infrastructure in that region.

In contrast, Gujarat – home to Amul – shows the highest organized sector penetration in the country. Amul processes 28 million litres per day through 18,600 village societies, representing the most advanced model of organized procurement anywhere in India. This regional variation underscores that improving disposal patterns toward organized channels requires location-specific strategies, not a one-size-fits-all approach.

The evolving landscape: shifting disposal patterns over time 🔗

India’s milk disposal pattern is not static. Urbanization, digital payment adoption, cold chain expansion, and growing consumer demand for branded dairy products are gradually tilting the balance toward the organized sector. India’s per capita milk availability rose from 370 grams per day in 2017-18 to 471 grams per day in 2023-24, and demand for processed, value-added dairy products is rising in step.

Initiatives like digital payment systems linking dairy cooperatives to farmer bank accounts – pioneered by organizations like Amul and adopted by Fino Payments Bank in partnership with Gokul Dairy and Mother Dairy – are removing one of the key barriers that kept small producers tied to the cash-in-hand model of informal vendors. IoT-based milk testing and cattle monitoring tools are also improving data transparency across the procurement chain.

Yet, as NDDB data shows, a large quantity of milk still remains unprocessed and outside any formal system. Bridging this gap requires sustained investment in rural dairy infrastructure, fair price mechanisms, and expanded cooperative membership – especially among the millions of small and marginal producers who form the backbone of India’s dairy economy.

What do you think? Given that organized sector procurement directly improves price realization for farmers and ensures quality standards for consumers, what specific policy or technology interventions could most effectively shift the balance from traditional to formal channels in states where cooperative penetration remains very low? And as home processing of milk into ghee and paneer is economically rational for small producers, how should procurement agencies account for this when designing price incentives?

References

1. https://tractorkarvan.com/blog/milk-production-in-india
2. https://www.mitsui.com/mgssi/en/report/detail/1225247_10744.html
3. https://www.ibef.org/blogs/digitalisation-of-india-s-dairy-farming
4. https://uja.in/blog/market-reports/dairy-industry-in-india/
5. https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/india-dairy-market
6. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Dairy+and+Products+Annual_New+Delhi_India_IN2022-0091
7. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09763996221091654
8. https://www.academia.edu/50147622/Production_consumption_marketed_surplus_and_disposal_pattern_of_milk_in_Andhra_Pradesh
9. https://www.phytojournal.com/archives/2019/vol8issue3/PartY/8-2-591-725.pdf
10. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11043808/
11. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJDS/article/view/47388
12. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311932.2022.2137897
13. https://www.nddb.coop/ndpi/focus/mps
14. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressNoteDetails.aspx?NoteId=151889&ModuleId=3
15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332532156_Production_consumption_marketed_surplus_and_disposal_pattern_of_milk_in_Andhra_Pradesh
16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278194920_Performance_of_dairy_co-operative_societies_and_milk_disposal_pattern_of_member_farmers_in_Jammu_and_Kashmir
17. https://www.pib.gov.in/FeaturesDeatils.aspx?NoteId=151137
18. https://www.investindia.gov.in/team-india-blogs/digital-milky-way-how-indian-start-ups-are-transforming-dairy-farming
19. https://www.nddb.coop/about/speech/dairyvision