Using Antibiotics and Bacteriocins in Meat Preservation

Meat spoilage is a serious concern in the food industry. Every year, millions of tonnes of meat are lost due to microbial contamination. To combat this, scientists and food technologists have turned to two powerful groups of antimicrobial agents – antibiotics and bacteriocins. Both are naturally produced by microorganisms and can kill or inhibit harmful bacteria. While some countries permit their use in meat preservation, the practice comes with significant health risks, especially the growing threat of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

What are antibiotics and bacteriocins? 🔗

Antibiotics are chemical compounds produced by certain fungi and bacteria that can kill or inhibit the growth of other microorganisms. Penicillin, for example, is derived from the mold Penicillium. In meat preservation, antibiotics like chlortetracycline and oxytetracycline have been used in some countries as surface treatments or packaging additives to prevent bacterial spoilage.

Bacteriocins, on the other hand, are ribosomally synthesized antimicrobial peptides produced mainly by bacteria, particularly lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Unlike broad-spectrum antibiotics, bacteriocins tend to be more targeted – they usually act against closely related bacterial species, though some like nisin have a wider range of activity. Bacteriocins are generally considered safer than antibiotics because they are broken down by digestive enzymes in the human gut and do not negatively affect the intestinal microflora.

Key differences between antibiotics and bacteriocins 🔗

While both antibiotics and bacteriocins are antimicrobial in nature, they differ in important ways. Antibiotics are secondary metabolites with a broad spectrum of activity, meaning they can affect many types of bacteria at once. Bacteriocins are primary metabolites – proteins or peptides synthesised by ribosomes – and are generally more species-specific in their action. This specificity is a major advantage. Bacteriocins can target harmful pathogens without wiping out the beneficial microbes in a food system or in the human body. Additionally, because bacteriocins disrupt bacterial membranes rather than interacting with specific cellular targets the way antibiotics do, they are less likely to induce resistance.

How are antibiotics used in meat preservation? 🔗

In countries where their use is permitted, antibiotics are applied to meat through several methods:

Surface treatment involves directly applying antibiotics to the meat surface. This creates a protective barrier against bacterial contamination, particularly at the meat-air interface where spoilage typically begins. Packaging integration is another method where antibiotics are incorporated into packaging materials, providing a slow-release antimicrobial effect throughout storage and transport. Finally, combination approaches pair antibiotics with refrigeration, vacuum packaging, or modified atmosphere packaging to create multiple barriers against bacterial growth.

Antibiotics used in meat processing primarily target Gram-positive bacteria, which are responsible for many types of spoilage and foodborne illness. However, it is crucial to note that many countries, including those in the European Union, have banned or severely restricted antibiotic use in meat preservation due to public health concerns around antimicrobial resistance.

How do bacteriocins preserve meat? 🔗

Bacteriocins work by disrupting essential processes in target bacteria. Their mechanisms of action fall into two broad categories. In the Class I mechanism, bacteriocins cross the bacterial cell wall and bind to lipid II, a molecule essential for building the peptidoglycan layer (cell wall). This binding prevents cell wall synthesis, ultimately killing the bacterium. In the Class II mechanism, bacteriocins form pores in the cell membrane by connecting to receptor molecules in the mannose-phosphotransferase system. These pores cause the cell contents to leak out, leading to rapid cell death.

Some bacteriocins, notably nisin, can act through both mechanisms simultaneously – inhibiting cell wall synthesis and forming pores in the membrane at the same time. This dual action makes nisin particularly effective.

Nisin: the most widely used bacteriocin 🔗

Nisin is a 34-amino-acid peptide produced by Lactococcus lactis. It was first isolated in the late 1930s, commercially produced since the 1950s, and recognised as safe for food use by the FDA (Generally Recognized as Safe) and the FAO/WHO. In the European Union, it is listed as food additive E234.

Nisin is effective against a wide range of Gram-positive organisms, including dangerous pathogens such as Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium botulinum, and Bacillus cereus. It is also highly effective against bacterial spores. In meat products like sausages and cured meats, nisin serves as a promising alternative to nitrate/nitrite salts, which have their own associated health risks.

However, nisin does have limitations in meat systems. It can bind to meat particles, distribute unevenly, and face interference from meat phospholipids and glutathione found in raw meat. For this reason, it often performs better in processed meat products than in raw meat, and is frequently used in combination with other preservation methods.

Pediocin and other bacteriocins in meat 🔗

Beyond nisin, several other bacteriocins show strong potential for meat preservation. Pediocin PA-1, produced by Pediococcus acidilactici, is particularly effective against Listeria species and is used in vegetable and meat products. Sakacins, enterocins, and leucocins – all produced by various LAB species commonly found in meat environments – are also being studied for their biopreservation potential.

Another notable example is Micocin®, a commercial mixture of bacteriocins produced by Carnobacterium maltaromaticum, which is effective against both Clostridium botulinum and Listeria monocytogenes. Currently, however, only nisin and pediocin PA-1 have received commercial approval as food preservatives.

Methods of applying bacteriocins to meat 🔗

There are three main strategies for using bacteriocins in meat preservation:

Direct addition involves incorporating purified bacteriocins into the meat product during processing. This is common in products like sausages and canned meats. Antimicrobial packaging is a more advanced approach where bacteriocins are embedded into the packaging film itself. The bacteriocin is slowly released from the packaging onto the food surface, providing ongoing protection during storage and distribution. Use of bacteriocin-producing cultures is a third approach where live LAB strains that produce bacteriocins are added to the meat. These “protective cultures” continuously produce bacteriocins in situ, offering a sustained antimicrobial effect.

The hurdle technology approach – combining bacteriocins with other preservation methods like refrigeration, modified atmosphere packaging, or mild heat treatment – often yields the best results. Each individual hurdle may not be sufficient on its own, but together they create conditions that are extremely difficult for spoilage organisms to overcome.

The antibiotic resistance crisis 🔗

The biggest concern with using antibiotics in meat preservation – and in livestock farming more broadly – is the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. The World Health Organization has identified antimicrobial resistance as one of the top global public health threats. When bacteria are repeatedly exposed to antibiotics, some develop mechanisms to survive. These resistant strains then multiply and can transfer resistance genes to other bacteria – even those that were never directly exposed.

This happens through several pathways. Selection pressure from constant antibiotic exposure ensures that only resistant bacteria survive and reproduce. Horizontal gene transfer allows bacteria to share resistance genes across species through plasmids, transposons, and other mobile genetic elements. Environmental spread occurs when antibiotic residues and resistant bacteria from meat processing facilities or animal farms enter soil and water systems, affecting even people who do not consume meat.

Research has shown that E. coli isolated from meat and poultry has developed resistance to commonly used drugs like sulfonamides, tetracycline, and ampicillin. Resistant bacteria can enter the food chain through contaminated meat, posing a direct threat to consumers. Without effective antibiotics, common infections become life-threatening and routine medical procedures such as surgeries and chemotherapy become far more dangerous.

Health risks of antibiotic residues in meat 🔗

Beyond resistance, antibiotic residues in meat products can cause direct toxicity, allergic reactions, and hypersensitive responses in consumers. Prolonged exposure to low-level residues can disrupt the gut microbiota, and some studies have linked long-term exposure to mutagenic and carcinogenic effects. For these reasons, countries that permit antibiotic use in meat typically enforce strict withdrawal periods, dosage limits, and residue testing protocols.

Global regulations and the shift toward bacteriocins 🔗

The regulatory landscape for antibiotics and bacteriocins in meat varies widely across the world. The European Union has taken one of the strictest positions, banning the routine use of antibiotics for growth promotion in livestock since 2006 and maintaining tight restrictions on their use in food preservation. Countries like Denmark and the Netherlands were early leaders in curbing non-medical antibiotic use in animal agriculture, and evidence shows that this approach has reduced antimicrobial resistance without negatively affecting meat production.

In the United States, the FDA has approved nisin for use in certain food products, and regulatory frameworks are gradually shifting toward more responsible antimicrobial use. The Codex Alimentarius, maintained by the FAO and WHO, provides international guidelines for harmonising food safety standards related to antibiotic residues.

This regulatory shift is driving increased investment in bacteriocin research. Because bacteriocins are naturally produced, non-toxic, and degraded by digestive enzymes, they align well with the growing consumer demand for clean-label products – foods with minimal, recognisable, and natural ingredients. However, the regulatory approval process for new bacteriocins remains slow, and only nisin and pediocin have achieved widespread commercial use so far.

Future directions in meat biopreservation 🔗

The future of meat preservation is moving firmly toward natural, targeted antimicrobial solutions. Several promising developments are underway:

Novel bacteriocins with broader antimicrobial spectra and improved stability are being discovered from diverse microbial sources. Bioengineering approaches are being used to modify existing bacteriocins for enhanced potency or expanded target range. Nanotechnology offers new possibilities – encapsulating bacteriocins in nanoparticles can improve their stability, protect them from degradation, and allow controlled release in food systems. Combining bacteriocins with bacteriophages (viruses that specifically target bacteria) or essential oils is another strategy being explored to broaden antimicrobial coverage while reducing the risk of resistance.

The One Health approach – which considers the interconnected health of humans, animals, and the environment – is becoming the guiding framework for responsible antimicrobial use in the food industry. This means using antibiotics only when absolutely necessary, investing in natural alternatives like bacteriocins, and ensuring that meat preservation methods do not contribute to the global antimicrobial resistance crisis.

What do you think? As antibiotic resistance continues to rise globally, should all countries ban the use of antibiotics in meat preservation and shift entirely to bacteriocins and other natural alternatives? And how can consumers play a role in driving the demand for meat products preserved using safer, natural methods?

References

1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9057404/
2. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1155/ijm/8723968
3. https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/antimicrobial-resistance-in-the-food-chain
4. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2019/4726510
5. https://portlandpress.com/bioscirep/article/45/04/277/235956/Toward-safer-and-sustainable-food-preservation-a
6. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44187-025-00472-w
7. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00594/full
8. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9637989/
9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10609446/
10. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/82512
11. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9090690/
12. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666154325001863
13. https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5637/11/3/142