Cooperatives exist in nearly every country and sector – from dairy farmers in New Zealand to credit unions in West Africa – and they all operate by the same rulebook. That rulebook is the seven cooperative principles, established by the International Cooperative Alliance (ICA) in 1995. These principles are not just abstract ideals. They are practical guidelines that tell a cooperative how to govern itself, treat its members, manage finances, and engage with the broader world. Understanding these principles is essential for anyone involved in – or thinking about joining – a cooperative, especially in agriculture where collective action can make or break a farmer’s livelihood.

Table of Contents

A brief background: where did these principles come from?

The story starts in 1844 in Rochdale, England, where a group of 28 workers – known as the Rochdale Pioneers – established what is widely recognized as the first modern cooperative. Facing poor wages and exploitative working conditions, they pooled their resources to open a store and laid down a set of rules for fair operation. Those rules became the foundation of the cooperative movement worldwide.

The original Rochdale Principles were officially adopted by the ICA in 1937, revised in 1966, and updated again in 1995 to reflect modern realities – including the addition of a seventh principle focused on community responsibility. Today, these seven principles guide cooperatives across all sectors globally, from small farmer groups to multinational cooperative enterprises. According to the National Cooperative Business Association (NCBA CLUSA), the ICA adopted these as standard guidelines for all cooperatives to follow, rooted in the values of voluntarism, democracy, and shared economic needs.

The seven cooperative principles explained

1. Voluntary and open membership

The first principle sets the tone for everything else: cooperatives are open to anyone who can use their services and is willing to accept the responsibilities of membership. According to the ICA, membership must be free from gender, social, racial, political, or religious discrimination. This is not just a moral stance – it is a structural one. A cooperative that selectively restricts membership based on arbitrary criteria contradicts its own foundation.

In practical terms, this means a farmers’ cooperative cannot turn away a smallholder farmer because of their caste, religion, or political views. It can, however, set relevant eligibility criteria – such as farming within a specific region or producing a particular crop – as long as those criteria apply equally to all. The principle protects both individual rights and the collective integrity of the cooperative.

2. Democratic member control

Cooperatives are democratic organizations where members actively participate in setting policies and making decisions. The defining feature is the one member, one vote rule. Unlike investor-owned companies where voting power is proportional to the number of shares held, every member of a cooperative has exactly one vote – whether they are a small subsistence farmer or the largest producer in the group.

Elected representatives and board members are accountable to the full membership. This democratic control keeps leadership in check and ensures decisions reflect the interests of the many, not just the few. It also means that members have both the right and the responsibility to participate in governance – attending meetings, electing leadership, and voting on key decisions.

3. Member economic participation

Members do not just use the cooperative – they also fund and control it. Under this principle, members contribute equitably to the cooperative’s capital, and at least part of that capital remains common property of the cooperative. Surpluses generated by the cooperative can be allocated to developing the cooperative, building reserves, returned to members in proportion to their transactions, or directed toward other activities approved by the membership.

This is fundamentally different from how profit is distributed in a conventional business. In an investor-owned firm, profits flow to shareholders based on investment. In a cooperative, economic benefits flow back to members based on how much they use the cooperative – not how much they invested. This structure ensures that profit distributions are shared exclusively among farmer-members rather than external shareholders, keeping economic benefits where the work is done.

4. Autonomy and independence

Cooperatives are self-help organizations controlled by their members. If they enter into agreements with other organizations – including governments – or raise capital from external sources, they must do so on terms that preserve democratic member control and protect the cooperative’s independent identity.

This principle is particularly important in agricultural settings where governments or NGOs sometimes fund cooperative development programs. While outside support is welcome and often necessary, it cannot come at the cost of member control. A cooperative that becomes financially dependent on a single government ministry or donor risks losing its ability to act in the best interests of its members. Historical evidence supports this concern – in many countries, cooperatives were historically used as instruments of state policy, with farmers often compelled to join, undermining the very principles the model is built on.

5. Education, training, and information

A cooperative is only as strong as the knowledge its members carry. This principle requires cooperatives to provide education and training for members, elected representatives, managers, and employees so they can contribute effectively to the cooperative’s development. Cooperatives are also expected to inform the general public – particularly young people and opinion leaders – about the nature and benefits of cooperation.

In agriculture, this translates to training farmers on better production techniques, understanding market prices, reading contracts, and participating meaningfully in governance. Without this, members may make uninformed decisions or remain passive participants rather than active co-owners. Research published in the Journal of Agricultural Economics found that cooperative members in Ethiopia, Kenya, and Uganda earned on average 20-30% more than non-members – benefits partly attributed to capacity building and access to information provided through the cooperative structure.

6. Cooperation among cooperatives

No cooperative is an island. By working together through local, national, regional, and international structures, cooperatives can improve services, strengthen local economies, and address social and community needs more effectively than any single cooperative can alone.

In practical terms, this might mean a local dairy cooperative joining a national federation to gain better bargaining power with processors, or agricultural cooperatives from different countries sharing research on climate-resilient crop varieties. The ICA itself is a product of this principle – a global body uniting cooperatives from over 100 countries to advocate, share knowledge, and coordinate action. Cooperation among cooperatives scales up the impact of the model from individual communities to entire economies.

7. Concern for community

The seventh and most recently added principle extends the cooperative’s responsibility beyond its membership. According to the ICA’s Statement on Cooperative Identity, cooperatives work for the sustainable development of their communities through policies approved by their members. This means balancing member needs with broader social and environmental responsibilities.

For agricultural cooperatives, this can manifest in many ways – maintaining sustainable land use practices, supporting local schools, investing in rural infrastructure, or contributing to food security beyond what is needed for the membership alone. Cooperatives help build sustainable communities in rural areas, and this principle formalizes that commitment. It distinguishes cooperatives from purely profit-driven enterprises whose obligations end at the balance sheet.

Why these principles matter for agricultural cooperatives

In farming communities – especially in developing countries where individual farmers lack market access, credit, and bargaining power – the cooperative model backed by these principles is transformative. Agricultural cooperatives play a critical role in rural socio-economic development, food security, and poverty alleviation, particularly in regions where agriculture is the primary source of income. They give smallholder farmers access to resources, education, tools, and markets that would otherwise be out of reach.

But the principles are not just aspirational – they are protective. When a cooperative strays from democratic governance, suppresses member participation, or becomes captured by external interests, it fails its members. The seven principles serve as a continuous check against such drift. They are, in effect, the ethical architecture of the cooperative model.

How the principles work together

It is worth noting that the seven principles are not independent rules – they reinforce one another. Open membership ensures a broad democratic base. Democratic control gives members the power to manage the capital they contribute. Autonomy protects that democracy from being overridden by outside interests. Education ensures members can exercise their democratic rights meaningfully. Cooperation among cooperatives amplifies the benefits of membership. And concern for community anchors the entire enterprise in a purpose larger than profit.

The ICA’s Statement of Cooperative Identity describes the principles as a living document – one that has evolved through collective revision over more than a century and will continue to evolve as the world changes. What has not changed is the underlying conviction that people can achieve more through structured cooperation than through individual effort alone. For farmers navigating volatile markets, climate uncertainty, and limited resources, that conviction is not just idealistic – it is deeply practical.

What do you think? Do you believe farmers in your region have enough awareness of these cooperative principles to fully benefit from membership? And which of the seven principles do you think is most difficult to uphold in practice – and why?

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 3.8 / 5. Vote count: 4

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

References
  1. https://ica.coop/en/cooperatives/cooperative-identity
  2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rochdale_Principles
  3. https://ncbaclusa.coop/resources/7-cooperative-principles/
  4. https://www.electric.coop/seven-cooperative-principles%E2%80%8B
  5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agricultural_cooperative
  6. https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/egms/docs/2009/cooperatives/Pinto.pdf
  7. https://metrobi.com/blog/agricultural-cooperatives-importance-types/
  8. https://eos.com/blog/agricultural-cooperatives/
  9. https://globalyouth.coop/en/cooperative-identity

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Cooperative and Farmers' Organizations

1 Evolution and Development of Cooperatives

  1. Concept and Definition
  2. Evolution of Cooperatives in Developing Countries
  3. Development of Cooperatives in India
  4. Cooperative Movement in India
  5. Cooperative Policies
  6. Different Forms of Agricultural and Rural Development Cooperatives
  7. Strategies for Successful Cooperatives

2 Principles and Practices of Cooperatives

  1. Principles of Cooperatives
  2. Operations in Cooperative Management
  3. Successful Cooperatives in Agriculture
  4. Indian Farmers Fertiliser Cooperative Limited (IFFCO)
  5. Krishak Bharati Cooperative Limited (KRIBHCO)
  6. National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Limited (NAFED)
  7. The Kaira District Cooperative Milk Producers’ Union Limited (Amul)
  8. Cooperatives for Economic and Social Empowerment

3 Structure, Laws and Management of Cooperatives

  1. Cooperative Laws and Bye-laws
  2. State Cooperative Laws
  3. Multi-state Cooperative Laws
  4. Bye-laws of Cooperatives
  5. Cooperative Structure
  6. Management of Cooperatives
  7. Monitoring and Policies
  8. Impact of Economic Liberalization on Cooperatives

4 People’s Participation in Agriculture and Rural Development

  1. Characteristics and Importance of People’s Participation
  2. Basic Principles of Participation
  3. Philosophy of Participatory Development
  4. Key Paradigm of Participatory Development Approach
  5. Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) Methodology
  6. Conditions for Participation
  7. Farmers Organisations
  8. Concept and Definitions of SHGs
  9. Characteristics of SHGs
  10. Advantages of SHGs
  11. Process of SHG Formation
  12. Micro-finance and SHG – Bank Linkage
  13. Empowerment of Rural People Through SHGs
  14. Gender Issues in Participation

5 Non- Government Organizations in Rural Development

  1. Formation of Non-Government Organisations (NGO)
  2. Characteristics of NGOs
  3. Types of NGOs
  4. Sources of Finance
  5. Advantages of NGOs over Government Organisations (GOs)
  6. Handicaps and Weaknesses of NGOs
  7. Role of NGOs in Rural Development
  8. Government Support to NGOs in India- Set Up of CAPART
  9. GO-NGO Collaboration
  10. Important NGOs in Rural Development in India

6 Policy Making for Cooperatives and Farmers Organizations

  1. Policy Making Bodies Related to Cooperatives and Farmers Organisations
  2. Department of Agriculture and Cooperation
  3. National Commission on Farmers (NCF)
  4. Planning Commission
  5. Reserve Bank of India (RBI)
  6. National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD)
  7. Participation of Cooperatives in Policy Decisions
  8. National Cooperative Union of India (NCUI)
  9. The National Cooperative Development Corporation (NCDC)
  10. Other Important Agencies Working for Promotion of Cooperative Movement in India
  11. Participation of Cooperatives and Farmers Associations in Policy Making – Some Examples
  12. AMUL
  13. MARKFED