In rural India, access to formal credit has long been a challenge. Banks found it difficult to reach remote villages, and the rural poor-especially women-were left at the mercy of informal moneylenders charging exorbitant interest rates. The SHG-Bank Linkage Programme (SHG-BLP) changed that equation. Launched by NABARD in 1992, this model connected small, community-driven Self-Help Groups with formal banking institutions, creating a bridge between informal savings practices and institutional finance. Today, it stands as the world’s largest microfinance programme, touching over 16 crore households across the country.

Table of Contents

What is the SHG-Bank linkage model?

The SHG-Bank Linkage Programme is a microfinance initiative that enables groups of 10 to 20 people-mostly women from similar socio-economic backgrounds-to pool their savings, lend to each other internally, and eventually access formal bank credit without any collateral. The idea is simple: the group’s collective savings history and disciplined financial behaviour serve as a substitute for the physical collateral that banks typically require.

The programme was born out of necessity. During the 1970s and 1980s, government-led credit schemes like the Integrated Rural Development Programme (IRDP) suffered from poor targeting and low repayment rates. NABARD began exploring community-based alternatives and, in 1986-87, initiated pilot projects linking informal Self-Help Groups with banks. The results were encouraging-high repayment rates and improved socio-economic outcomes among members. By 1992, the programme was formally launched in collaboration with the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and commercial banks, starting with just 500 SHGs.

The three models of SHG-Bank linkage

The SHG-Bank Linkage Programme operates through three distinct models, each with a different institutional arrangement:

Model I: Banks form and finance SHGs directly

In this model, the banks themselves take responsibility for forming, nurturing, and eventually financing the Self-Help Groups. The bank acts as the Self-Help Group Promoting Institution (SHPI). This model works best where banks have strong rural outreach and dedicated staff for grassroots engagement.

Model II: NGOs form SHGs, banks finance them

This is the most widely adopted model across India. Here, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) or government agencies organise and nurture the SHGs, but the actual credit is provided directly by banks. The NGO acts as the facilitator, guiding groups through savings practices, record-keeping, and group dynamics, while the bank handles the financial transactions.

Model III: NGOs as financial intermediaries

In this model, NGOs borrow funds from banks and then on-lend to SHGs. The NGO takes on the role of a financial intermediary, managing the credit flow between banks and the groups. This model is less common but is useful in areas where direct bank access is limited.

In all three models, SHGs open savings accounts with banks. Based on their track record of regular savings and internal lending, banks extend collateral-free loans-usually in multiples of the group’s accumulated savings.

How the SHG-Bank linkage process works

The process of linking a Self-Help Group with a bank follows a structured sequence that builds financial credibility over time.

Group formation and savings

A group of 10-20 individuals, usually women from similar backgrounds, come together voluntarily. They agree to save a fixed amount regularly-even as little as โ‚น10-50 per week. These savings are pooled into a common fund. NABARD’s guidelines emphasise five core principles, often called Panchsutras: regular meetings, consistent savings, internal lending based on member demand, timely loan repayment, and proper maintenance of records.

Internal lending

After a few months of regular savings, the group begins lending from its pooled fund to members who need credit. The interest rates and terms are decided collectively by the group. This phase builds financial discipline and gives members experience managing credit.

Bank linkage and credit access

After six months to a year of consistent savings and internal lending, the group becomes eligible for bank credit. The bank assesses the group’s savings record, meeting regularity, and internal lending performance before extending a loan. These loans are collateral-free, relying on mutual guarantee and peer accountability within the group. Typically, the bank provides credit as a multiple of the group’s total savings-often two to four times the amount.

Repayment and repeat cycles

The group repays the bank loan over a set period, and once repaid, can access larger amounts in subsequent cycles. The participative nature of the group ensures strong peer pressure for timely repayment. According to the Ministry of Rural Development, the loan repayment rate by SHGs to banks stands at 97.71%, which is significantly higher than most other rural lending programmes.

Scale and reach of the programme

What started as a small pilot with 500 SHGs in 1992-93 has grown into a massive national movement. As reported in NABARD’s Status of Microfinance in India report, the SHG-BLP had reached approximately 16.23 crore households by March 2023, with 1.34 crore SHGs linked to savings accounts and 42.96 lakh SHGs linked to credit. Bank loans outstanding under the programme amounted to โ‚น1.88 lakh crore as of March 2023, with the average loan per SHG rising to โ‚น2.70 lakh.

The programme has also drawn active collaboration from a wide range of institutions. NABARD serves as the nodal agency, providing refinance to banks, formulating operational guidelines, and supporting capacity building. The RBI supports the initiative through simplified lending norms and classification of SHG lending under priority sector lending. Commercial banks, Regional Rural Banks (RRBs), and cooperative banks all participate as lending partners.

Empowering women through microfinance

One of the most significant outcomes of the SHG-Bank Linkage Programme has been the empowerment of rural women. Over 84% of the SHGs linked to the programme are exclusively women’s groups. This is not a coincidence-the programme was designed with women’s empowerment as a core objective.

Research published in the Community Development Journal highlights that the SHG-BLP serves as a platform for introducing social, economic, and political change among women. It goes beyond microfinance to address development challenges including education, health, entrepreneurship, and grassroots political participation. In 1999, the Government of India formally adopted the SHG-BLP as a core development strategy focused on organising women into SHGs as a pathway to empowerment.

Studies on the programme’s impact have found measurable improvements. According to research cited by the Taylor & Francis journal, households belonging to all-female SHGs performed better in terms of income, savings, and poverty reduction compared to other types of SHGs. The fall in poverty was particularly pronounced for members of women-only groups-a 26 percentage point drop between the pre-SHG and post-SHG periods.

Beyond financial inclusion

The benefits extend well beyond access to credit. SHG membership has been linked to increased self-confidence, improved decision-making power within the household, greater access to government welfare schemes, and stronger political participation at the panchayat level. In states like Assam, studies have shown that SHG participation helps reduce social exclusion and improves access to services like clean drinking water, sanitation, and clean cooking fuel through government schemes.

Reducing dependence on informal moneylenders

Before the SHG-BLP, the rural poor had few options for credit. Formal banks were inaccessible, and informal moneylenders filled the gap-but at crushing interest rates that often trapped families in debt cycles. The SHG-Bank Linkage model directly addresses this problem by bringing affordable institutional credit to people’s doorsteps.

Programmes like the Jeevika initiative in Bihar have demonstrated that microfinance delivered through SHGs can significantly reduce reliance on informal moneylenders. The group-based lending approach also shifts the power dynamic-members collectively decide loan terms, and the interest earned stays within the group rather than enriching an outside lender.

The model is particularly effective because it builds on existing social networks. Members know each other, trust each other, and hold each other accountable. This social capital is what makes collateral-free lending viable at such a massive scale.

Role of NABARD and DAY-NRLM

NABARD has been the driving force behind the SHG-Bank Linkage Programme from its inception. Beyond providing refinance support to banks, NABARD extends promotional grants to various Self-Help Group Promoting Institutions (SHPIs), including NGOs, farmers’ clubs, SHG federations, and individual rural volunteers. It has also launched initiatives like e-Shakti, a digitisation project that creates an online database of SHG records to improve transparency and efficiency in bank linkage.

Since 2011, the programme has been further strengthened under the Deendayal Antyodaya Yojana – National Rural Livelihoods Mission (DAY-NRLM). This centrally sponsored scheme, implemented by the Ministry of Rural Development, focuses on organising rural women into SHGs, building their institutional capacity, and providing interest subvention benefits. An impact evaluation by the International Initiative for Impact Evaluation found that DAY-NRLM delivered a 19% income boost and a 28% increase in household savings across nine states.

More recently, the Government of India launched the Lakhpati Didi Scheme, which aims to support mature SHG women in becoming micro-entrepreneurs earning โ‚น1 lakh or more annually-a step towards women-led development in rural areas.

Challenges facing the SHG-Bank linkage model

Despite its remarkable success, the SHG-BLP faces several challenges that need attention:

Regional imbalances

The programme’s reach is heavily concentrated in the southern and eastern regions of India. The Southern region alone accounts for about 63% of credit disbursement, while states in the north, northeast, and central regions lag behind significantly. Weak banking networks, fewer NGO activities, and social factors contribute to this disparity.

Credit linkage gap

While more than 1.34 crore SHGs have savings accounts with banks, only about 43 lakh are credit-linked. This means there remains a credit linkage gap of nearly 48%, indicating that many SHGs that save regularly with banks are still unable to access credit.

Quality of SHGs and financial literacy

Not all SHGs function as effectively as the model envisions. Issues like irregular meetings, poor record-keeping, limited financial literacy, and dominance by a few members can weaken group performance. Many SHG members still lack the business skills needed to use credit productively for income-generating activities.

Rising NPAs

Non-performing assets (NPAs) in the microfinance sector rose sharply during the COVID-19 pandemic, reaching 11.6% by March 2022 before declining to about 10.3% by March 2023. While the overall trend is improving, high NPAs remain a concern, particularly for banks in certain regions.

What makes the SHG-Bank linkage model unique

The SHG-BLP stands apart from other microfinance models in several important ways. Unlike Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) that directly lend to individuals at market-based interest rates, the SHG-BLP is community-owned and community-managed. It prioritises empowerment and inclusion over commercial profitability. Interest rates are generally lower, and the group itself decides how to allocate and manage funds.

The model also integrates savings and credit-members build a savings habit first, which creates financial discipline and a safety net before they take on debt. This savings-led approach is fundamentally different from the credit-led approach of many MFIs, and it contributes to the programme’s remarkably high repayment rates.

Furthermore, the SHG platform has evolved beyond microfinance. It now serves as a delivery mechanism for a range of government programmes-from health and nutrition initiatives to skill development and livelihood promotion-making it a multi-sector platform for rural development.

The road ahead

The SHG-Bank Linkage Programme has proven that community-based finance can work at scale. But to sustain its growth and deepen its impact, the focus needs to shift towards expanding the programme into underserved regions, closing the credit linkage gap, improving financial literacy among members, and supporting SHGs in transitioning from basic savings-and-credit groups to viable micro-enterprises.

Technology will play a critical role. Digital tools for record-keeping, mobile banking platforms, and online marketplaces for SHG products (such as NABARD’s integration with ONDC) can help groups access larger markets and manage their finances more efficiently. Capacity-building programmes must also be scaled to ensure that SHG members have the entrepreneurial skills to make the most of the credit available to them.

What do you think? Can the SHG-Bank Linkage model be successfully replicated in regions where it currently has low penetration, or does its success depend on specific social and cultural conditions? How can technology bridge the gap between rural SHGs and formal financial institutions more effectively?

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

References
  1. https://www.nabard.org/content.aspx?id=477
  2. https://www.gktoday.in/shg-bank-linkage-programme/
  3. https://rural.nic.in/en/press-release/loan-repayment-rate-shgs-banks-9771-percent
  4. https://www.nabard.org/auth/writereaddata/tender/status-of-microfinance-in-india-2022-23.pdf
  5. https://www.nabard.org/contentsearch.aspx?AID=225&Key=shg+bank+linkage+programme
  6. https://academic.oup.com/cdj/article/58/2/283/6374653
  7. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09584935.2012.737306
  8. https://www.drishtiias.com/daily-updates/daily-news-analysis/qutcome-of-shg-bank-linkage-project

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Cooperative and Farmers' Organizations

1 Evolution and Development of Cooperatives

  1. Concept and Definition
  2. Evolution of Cooperatives in Developing Countries
  3. Development of Cooperatives in India
  4. Cooperative Movement in India
  5. Cooperative Policies
  6. Different Forms of Agricultural and Rural Development Cooperatives
  7. Strategies for Successful Cooperatives

2 Principles and Practices of Cooperatives

  1. Principles of Cooperatives
  2. Operations in Cooperative Management
  3. Successful Cooperatives in Agriculture
  4. Indian Farmers Fertiliser Cooperative Limited (IFFCO)
  5. Krishak Bharati Cooperative Limited (KRIBHCO)
  6. National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Limited (NAFED)
  7. The Kaira District Cooperative Milk Producers’ Union Limited (Amul)
  8. Cooperatives for Economic and Social Empowerment

3 Structure, Laws and Management of Cooperatives

  1. Cooperative Laws and Bye-laws
  2. State Cooperative Laws
  3. Multi-state Cooperative Laws
  4. Bye-laws of Cooperatives
  5. Cooperative Structure
  6. Management of Cooperatives
  7. Monitoring and Policies
  8. Impact of Economic Liberalization on Cooperatives

4 People’s Participation in Agriculture and Rural Development

  1. Characteristics and Importance of People’s Participation
  2. Basic Principles of Participation
  3. Philosophy of Participatory Development
  4. Key Paradigm of Participatory Development Approach
  5. Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) Methodology
  6. Conditions for Participation
  7. Farmers Organisations
  8. Concept and Definitions of SHGs
  9. Characteristics of SHGs
  10. Advantages of SHGs
  11. Process of SHG Formation
  12. Micro-finance and SHG – Bank Linkage
  13. Empowerment of Rural People Through SHGs
  14. Gender Issues in Participation

5 Non- Government Organizations in Rural Development

  1. Formation of Non-Government Organisations (NGO)
  2. Characteristics of NGOs
  3. Types of NGOs
  4. Sources of Finance
  5. Advantages of NGOs over Government Organisations (GOs)
  6. Handicaps and Weaknesses of NGOs
  7. Role of NGOs in Rural Development
  8. Government Support to NGOs in India- Set Up of CAPART
  9. GO-NGO Collaboration
  10. Important NGOs in Rural Development in India

6 Policy Making for Cooperatives and Farmers Organizations

  1. Policy Making Bodies Related to Cooperatives and Farmers Organisations
  2. Department of Agriculture and Cooperation
  3. National Commission on Farmers (NCF)
  4. Planning Commission
  5. Reserve Bank of India (RBI)
  6. National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD)
  7. Participation of Cooperatives in Policy Decisions
  8. National Cooperative Union of India (NCUI)
  9. The National Cooperative Development Corporation (NCDC)
  10. Other Important Agencies Working for Promotion of Cooperative Movement in India
  11. Participation of Cooperatives and Farmers Associations in Policy Making – Some Examples
  12. AMUL
  13. MARKFED